Amica Mutual Insurance Company v. Farhar

Full title: AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Rhode Island corporation, Plaintiff, v…

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jan 31, 2006

Civil Case No. 05-cv-00162-REB-MJW (D. Colo. Jan. 31, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 05-cv-00162-REB-MJW.

January 31, 2006

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PRECLUDE EXPERT WITNESSES, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESSES

ROBERT BLACKBURN, District Judge

The matter before me is Plaintiff's Motion to Preclude Expert Witnesses, or in the Alternative, Motion for Extension of Time to Disclose Expert Witnesses [#38], filed November 2, 2005. Plaintiff seeks to preclude defendant from offering the testimony of Richard Laugesen during the coverage phase of this bifurcated trial. In the Final Pretrial Order Re: Claims for Declaratory Judgment [#69], which was filed earlier today, neither party has designated Laugesen as a potential witness for the February 8-9, 2006, bench trial. Because plaintiff has effectively received the relief requested by the motion, the motion is moot.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Preclude Expert Witnesses, or in the Alternative, Motion for Extension of Time to Disclose Expert Witnesses [#38], filed November 2, 2005, is DENIED AS MOOT.