From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Muldowney

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 27, 2016
149 A.3d 497 (Conn. 2016)

Opinion

09-27-2016

Amica Mutual Insurance Company v. Andrew Muldowney et al.

Daniel P. Schofield, in support of the petition. Susan L. Miller and Dennis M. Carnelli, in opposition.


Daniel P. Schofield, in support of the petition.

Susan L. Miller and Dennis M. Carnelli, in opposition.

The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn. App. 831, 142 A.3d 439 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff had a right of equitable subrogation against the defendants, the residential tenants of its insured, under DiLullo v. Joseph, 259 Conn. 847, 792 A.2d 819 (2000) ?”

McDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Muldowney

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 27, 2016
149 A.3d 497 (Conn. 2016)
Case details for

Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Muldowney

Case Details

Full title:Amica Mutual Insurance Company v. Andrew Muldowney et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Sep 27, 2016

Citations

149 A.3d 497 (Conn. 2016)
323 Conn. 916

Citing Cases

Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Muldowney

Id., at 841, 843–44, 142 A.3d 439.We granted the defendants' petition for certification to appeal limited to…