From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amezcua v. Goldman Sachs Bank USA

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 22, 2024
8:22-cv-01663-JWH-JDE (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2024)

Opinion

8:22-cv-01663-JWH-JDE

01-22-2024

ARTURO MICHAEL AMEZCUA, Plaintiff, v. GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

JOHN W. HOLCOMB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to the “Order Regarding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 12]; Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Arbitration [ECF No. 18]; and Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint [ECF No. 20] ” filed concurrently herewith, and in accordance with Rules 12(b)(6) and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

1. This Court possesses subject matter jurisdiction over the above-captioned action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

2. The operative pleading is the Complaint [ECF No. 1] of Plaintiff Arturo Michael Amezcua.

3. Defendant Goldman Sachs Bank USA shall have JUDGMENT in its FAVOR, and AGAINST Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall take nothing by way of his Complaint. This action is DISMISSED.

4. Other than potential post-judgment remedies (including those provided in Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), to the extent that any party requests any other form of relief, such request is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Amezcua v. Goldman Sachs Bank USA

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 22, 2024
8:22-cv-01663-JWH-JDE (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Amezcua v. Goldman Sachs Bank USA

Case Details

Full title:ARTURO MICHAEL AMEZCUA, Plaintiff, v. GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 22, 2024

Citations

8:22-cv-01663-JWH-JDE (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2024)