Opinion
April, 1907.
Order eversed, with costs, and verdict reinstated on the ground that the case was one which permitted punitive damages. Hirschberg, P.J., Hooker and Miller, JJ., concurred; Woodward and Jenks, JJ., voted for affirmance.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
AMEY v. BROOKLYN DAILY EAGLE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1907
119 App. Div. 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Summaries of
AMEY v. BROOKLYN DAILY EAGLE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1907
119 App. Div. 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Case details for
AMEY v. BROOKLYN DAILY EAGLE
Case Details
Full title:Mary Amey, Appellant, v. The Brooklyn Daily Eagle, Respondent
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Apr 1, 1907
Citations
119 App. Div. 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)