Opinion
2011-12-30
Richard N. AMES, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Robert James SHUTE, Defendant–Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Anthony J. Paris, J.), rendered June 8, 2010. The judgment, inter alia, confirmed the report of the Referee and ordered a foreclosure and sale.Woodruff Lee Carroll, Syracuse, for defendant–appellant. Richard N. Ames, Fayetteville, plaintiff–respondent pro se.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Anthony J. Paris, J.), rendered June 8, 2010. The judgment, inter alia, confirmed the report of the Referee and ordered a foreclosure and sale.Woodruff Lee Carroll, Syracuse, for defendant–appellant. Richard N. Ames, Fayetteville, plaintiff–respondent pro se.
MEMORANDUM:
On appeal from a judgment of foreclosure and sale, defendant contends for the first time on appeal that, inter alia, the mortgage loan documents should be construed together with a joint venture agreement between plaintiff, defendant and a nonparty. Inasmuch as defendant failed to raise that contention at Supreme Court, it is not properly before us ( see Ciesinski v. Town of Aurora, 202 A.D.2d 984, 985, 609 N.Y.S.2d 745). In any event, we have considered the merits of defendant's contentions that are raised for the first time on appeal and conclude that they are without merit.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.