From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amerson v. Chase Home Fin. LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01041-WJM-MEH (D. Colo. Jan. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01041-WJM-MEH

01-24-2012

GALEN AMERSON, and FRANCES M. SCOTT, Plaintiffs, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC, FANNIE MAE, and CASTLE MEINHOLD & STAWIARSKI, LLC, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on January 24, 2012.

Before the Court is Plaintiff's (sic) Memorandum in Support of Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions [filed January 23, 2011; docket #82]. To date, Plaintiffs have filed three motions for sanctions, all of which the Court has denied. Plaintiffs' first motion for sanctions was denied without prejudice for failure to confer under D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A [docket #29], and Plaintiffs' second motion was denied on the merits for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 5.1G and Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2) [docket #79]. The instant motion contains all three deficiencies; namely, Plaintiffs failed to confer under D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A, failed to certify service on all Defendants, and failed to provide Defendants with the 21-day safe harbor provision required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2). Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion is stricken. Plaintiffs are admonished that their continued disregard for the federal and local rules may result in sanctions against them.


Summaries of

Amerson v. Chase Home Fin. LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01041-WJM-MEH (D. Colo. Jan. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Amerson v. Chase Home Fin. LLC

Case Details

Full title:GALEN AMERSON, and FRANCES M. SCOTT, Plaintiffs, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 24, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01041-WJM-MEH (D. Colo. Jan. 24, 2012)