From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amerson v. Alehya

Supreme Court of Iowa
Jan 31, 2007
728 N.W.2d 853 (Iowa 2007)

Opinion

No. 05-0951.

January 31, 2007.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Karen A. Romano and Eliza Ovrom, Judges.

Plaintiff Mary Amerson appeals from district court's order of dismissal, order denying default judgment, judgment in favor of defendants following a bench trial, and ruling on motion for recusal and for a new trial. AFFIRMED.

Mary Amerson, Des Moines, pro se.

Hugh J. Cain and Jeffrey M. Margolin of Hopkins Huebner, P.C., Des Moines, for appellee, David Kriens and Kriens Plumbing.

Susan A. Low, Assistant City Attorney, Des Moines, for City of Des Moines.

Considered by HUITINK, P.J., and VOGEL and BAKER, JJ.


After a careful review of the record, we affirm without opinion pursuant to Iowa Rules of Appellate Procedure 6.24(1) and (4).

We find that none of the parties designated unnecessary matters to be included in the appendix. Therefore, we will not tax the costs of inclusion of unnecessary documents against either defendant.

AFFIRMED.

HARBIT v. TINNIAN, 728 N.W.2d 853 (Iowa 2007)

No. 05-1280.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, L.

dismissing his three petitions in the above-entitled matters.

Considered by MAHAN, P.J., and MILLER and VAITHESWARAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Iowa Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.24(1) and (4), we affirm the district court's ruling without opinion.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Amerson v. Alehya

Supreme Court of Iowa
Jan 31, 2007
728 N.W.2d 853 (Iowa 2007)
Case details for

Amerson v. Alehya

Case Details

Full title:Amerson v. Alehya

Court:Supreme Court of Iowa

Date published: Jan 31, 2007

Citations

728 N.W.2d 853 (Iowa 2007)