From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ameris Bank v. T&M Transp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 24, 2024
8:24-cv-00611 -DOC (DFMx) (C.D. Cal. May. 24, 2024)

Opinion

8:24-cv-00611 -DOC (DFMx)

05-24-2024

Ameris Bank v. T & M Transport LLC, et al


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff's counsel to submit a response in writing no later than May 31, 2024, to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above Dated:

X Answer to the complaint;
X Request for Entry of Default; or
X Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (F.R.Civ.P. 41)

It is plaintiffs responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiffs must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon the default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court. Local Rule 7-1.

Failure to respond by the date above will result in a Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution.


Summaries of

Ameris Bank v. T&M Transp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 24, 2024
8:24-cv-00611 -DOC (DFMx) (C.D. Cal. May. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Ameris Bank v. T&M Transp.

Case Details

Full title:Ameris Bank v. T & M Transport LLC, et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 24, 2024

Citations

8:24-cv-00611 -DOC (DFMx) (C.D. Cal. May. 24, 2024)