From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ameriquest Mortgage Company v. Zimmerle

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Mar 12, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-cv-02046-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 12, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-cv-02046-MSK-BNB.

March 12, 2009


ORDER


Counsel for the plaintiff appeared this morning in connection with Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of . . . Default Judgment [Doc. # 9, filed 2/2/2009] (the "Motion"). Upon review, it appears that the Motion must be supplemented in the following particulars:

(1) The statement of the amount due under the promissory note must be itemized with greater particularity to specify principal, interest, late fees, and any other elements, including how and when the amounts were incurred;

(2) The claim for litigation and collection costs must be made more particular and the claim for attorney fees must be supported by contemporaneous time records; and

(3) Provision must be made for compliance with Part V.J.1.e. of Judge Krieger's Practice Standards, which requires:

[I]f the action is on a promissory note, the original note shall be presented to the court in order that the court may make a notation of the judgment on the face of the note. . . .

IT IS ORDERED that on or before April 1, 2009, the plaintiff shall file a supplement to the Motion as specified above.


Summaries of

Ameriquest Mortgage Company v. Zimmerle

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Mar 12, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-cv-02046-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Ameriquest Mortgage Company v. Zimmerle

Case Details

Full title:AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation Plaintiff, v. KENNETH…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Mar 12, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-cv-02046-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 12, 2009)