Opinion
Argued February 6, 1940 —
Decided May 2, 1940.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 123 N.J.L. 81.
For the respondent, Edward R. McGlynn.
For the appellants, Fleming Potter, Russell Fleming and Morgan R. Seiffert.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — CASE, DONGES, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WOLFSKEIL, JJ. 6.
For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, PERSKIE, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 5.