From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

American Motors Corp. v. Kenosha

U.S.
Mar 10, 1958
356 U.S. 21 (1958)

Summary

affirming per curiam the decision of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, reported in 274 Wis. 315, 80 N.W.2d 363, on the authority of the Murray case

Summary of this case from Ford Motor Co. v. Korzen

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.

No. 343.

Decided March 10, 1958.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, John N. Stull, A. F. Prescott and H. Eugene Heine, Jr. for the United States, and Alfred E. LaFrance for the American Motors Corporation, appellants.

Wm. J. P. Abert and Robert V. Baker for appellee.


The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, MR. JUSTICE BURTON, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER dissent for the reasons set forth in their dissenting opinions in City of Detroit v. Murray Corp., 355 U.S. 489, 495, 505, 511, decided March 3, 1958.


Summaries of

American Motors Corp. v. Kenosha

U.S.
Mar 10, 1958
356 U.S. 21 (1958)

affirming per curiam the decision of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, reported in 274 Wis. 315, 80 N.W.2d 363, on the authority of the Murray case

Summary of this case from Ford Motor Co. v. Korzen
Case details for

American Motors Corp. v. Kenosha

Case Details

Full title:AMERICAN MOTORS CORP. ET AL. v . CITY OF KENOSHA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 10, 1958

Citations

356 U.S. 21 (1958)
78 S. Ct. 559

Citing Cases

General Dynamics Corp. v. County of L.A

To be valid a use or possession tax would have to apply to all tax exempt property so as not to discriminate…

Ford Motor Co. v. Korzen

Under such a statute it is understandable that the decision was affirmed by the United States Supreme Court…