From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

American Housing Preservation Corporation v. Blum

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Mar 16, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-cv-01229-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 16, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01229-MSK-BNB.

March 16, 2006


ORDER DISMISSING CASE, WITHOUT PREJUDICE


THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs' Notice of Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (#49). They contend that their claims must be dismissed, without prejudice, because they destroyed the Court's diversity jurisdiction through the filing of a Third Amended Complaint.

The Court ordered the Defendants to respond to such notice by March 15, 2006. Instead of filing a response, the Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss and for Attorney Fees (#51). The Defendants assert that if the Court dismisses the Plaintiffs' claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b), then an award of attorney fees is mandatory under Colorado law.

The parties agree that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs' claims. Therefore, the Court dismisses the Plaintiffs' claims pursuant to their Notice, rather than pursuant to the Motion to Dismiss.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that pursuant to the Plaintiffs' Notice, the Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed, without prejudice. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and for Attorney Fees (#51) is DENIED, as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

American Housing Preservation Corporation v. Blum

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Mar 16, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-cv-01229-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 16, 2006)
Case details for

American Housing Preservation Corporation v. Blum

Case Details

Full title:AMERICAN HOUSING PRESERVATION CORPORATION, PM HOUSING LP, PW HOUSING LP…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Mar 16, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01229-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 16, 2006)