Opinion
Argued October 4, 1910
Decided October 25, 1910
S.D. Bentley for appellants.
William W. Armstrong for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
American Ferrofix Brazing Company v. Potter
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 25, 1910
93 N.E. 1130 (N.Y. 1910)
Summaries of
American Ferrofix Brazing Company v. Potter
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 25, 1910
93 N.E. 1130 (N.Y. 1910)
Case details for
American Ferrofix Brazing Company v. Potter
Case Details
Full title:AMERICAN FERROFIX BRAZING COMPANY, Respondent, v . NATHANIEL R. POTTER et…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 25, 1910
Citations
93 N.E. 1130 (N.Y. 1910)
93 N.E. 1130