From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

American Creosoting Co. v. Reddington

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Feb 18, 1925
146 N.E. 761 (Ind. Ct. App. 1925)

Opinion

No. 11,409.

Filed February 18, 1925. Rehearing denied April 28, 1925. Transfer denied June 30, 1925.

JUDGMENT. — Review of judgment not permissible after time for appeal has expired. — An action to review a judgment cannot be prosecuted where the time for taking an appeal has expired.

From Decatur Circuit Court; John D. Megee, Special Judge.

Action by the American Creosoting Company against William Reddington. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals. Appeal dismissed. By the second division.

Goddard Hite and Watson Esarey, for appellant.

Charles L. Tindall, Donald L. Smith, John H. Kiplinger, Ed K. Adams and Thomas E. Davidson, for appellee.


On February 16, 1915, appellant filed its complaint to review a judgment rendered against it and in favor of appellee, March 21, 1914; a motion for a new trial having been overruled prior to the rendition of the judgment.

From a judgment denying the review, appellant appeals. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for the reason that appellant's complaint to review was filed more than 180 days after the original judgment was rendered and at a time when there was no right to an appeal from that judgment.

On authority of Talge Mahogany Co. v. Astoria Mahogany Co. (1923), 195 Ind. 433, 141 N.E. 50, 145 N.E. 495, motion to dismiss is sustained, and appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

American Creosoting Co. v. Reddington

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Feb 18, 1925
146 N.E. 761 (Ind. Ct. App. 1925)
Case details for

American Creosoting Co. v. Reddington

Case Details

Full title:AMERICAN CREOSOTING COMPANY v. REDDINGTON

Court:Court of Appeals of Indiana

Date published: Feb 18, 1925

Citations

146 N.E. 761 (Ind. Ct. App. 1925)
146 N.E. 761

Citing Cases

Morton-Finney v. Jennings

Where a complaint to review a judgment for errors of law is filed after the time for perfecting an appeal has…

Browne v. Blood

"If an action to review for errors of law is not filed until after the time for taking an appeal has expired,…