concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding causation opinion based on differential diagnosis
Summary of this case from Turner v. Iowa Fire Equipment Co.No. 98-977.
April 19, 1999.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 143 F. 3d 937.
concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding causation opinion based on differential diagnosis
Summary of this case from Turner v. Iowa Fire Equipment Co.noting that the five-factor test "amounts to a way for a district judge to think about what to do, not a series of conditions precedent" to dismissal
Summary of this case from Ibrahim v. S & A Capital Partners, Inc.noting that the five-factor test "amounts to a way for a district judge to think about what to do, not a series of conditions precedent" to dismissal
Summary of this case from Carter v. Molina Healthcare of Cal.noting that the five-factor test "amounts to a way for a district judge to think about what to do, not a series of conditions precedent" to dismissal
Summary of this case from Rojas v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs. LLCnoting that the five-factor test "amounts to a way for a district judge to think about what to do, not a series of conditions precedent" to dismissal
Summary of this case from Gomez v. Ciccero's Pizza, Inc.Full title:AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ET AL. v. RITCHIE, GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE OF PETER
Court:U.S.
Date published: Apr 19, 1999
Doc. 47), IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED due to, among other reasons, the acknowledged failure of…
Ice Embassy, Inc. v. City of HoustonTo demonstrate reliability, the proponent of the expert testimony must present "some objective, independent…