From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ameranth, Inc. v. Olo Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Oct 8, 2021
No. 2021-1211 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 8, 2021)

Opinion

2021-1211

10-08-2021

AMERANTH, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. OLO INC., Defendant-Appellee

Richard Charles Weinblatt, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC, Wilmington, DE, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Heidi Lyn Keefe, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Lowell D. Mead.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:20-cv-00518-LPS, Judge Leonard P. Stark.

Richard Charles Weinblatt, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC, Wilmington, DE, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Heidi Lyn Keefe, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Lowell D. Mead.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Order ed and Adjudged:

PER CURIAM

(Moore, Chief Judge, Prost and Taranto, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Ameranth, Inc. v. Olo Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Oct 8, 2021
No. 2021-1211 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Ameranth, Inc. v. Olo Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AMERANTH, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. OLO INC., Defendant-Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 8, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-1211 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 8, 2021)