From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AMER v. FOLK

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Nov 1, 1900
32 Misc. 733 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Opinion

November, 1900.

Hastings Gleason (George S. Hastings, of counsel), for appellants.

Blumenstiel Hirsch (Morris J. Hirsch, of counsel), for respondents.


The only question in this case was whether there had been an accord and satisfaction between the parties. This issue was submitted to the jury by a charge which correctly followed the opinion delivered when this case was here on a former appeal. Amer v. Folk, 28 Misc. 508. The evidence was conflicting and amply supported the judgment rendered against the defendants.

The order denying the defendants' motion to set aside the verdict is not appealable to this court.

Present: TRAUX, P.J., SCOTT and DUGRO, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

AMER v. FOLK

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Nov 1, 1900
32 Misc. 733 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)
Case details for

AMER v. FOLK

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD C. AMER et al., Respondents, v . JOHN FOLK et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Nov 1, 1900

Citations

32 Misc. 733 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)