From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amer. Trans. Ins. v. Val-Roc Trking, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 18, 1997
242 A.D.2d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 18, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Norman Ryp, J.).


Plaintiff has no obligation to defend or indemnify defendants owner and driver, it being undisputed that any insurance coverage was terminated at least two and a half months before the accident. The prior proceeding, which resulted in a finding that the offending vehicle was insured by plaintiff at the time of the accident ( see, Desriusseaux v. Val-Roc Truck Corp., 230 A.D.2d 704), does not collaterally estop plaintiff from asserting otherwise herein, the prior finding of coverage having been made on default in a proceeding that involved a potential financial exposure inconsequential compared to the damages sought in the negligence action ( see, Matter of Halyalkar v. Board of Regents, 72 N.Y.2d 261).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Rubin, Tom and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

Amer. Trans. Ins. v. Val-Roc Trking, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 18, 1997
242 A.D.2d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Amer. Trans. Ins. v. Val-Roc Trking, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. VAL-ROC TRUCKING, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 18, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 309