From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amendola v. Reissner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
Jul 27, 2012
NO. 1:11-CV-01001-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 1:11-CV-01001-AWI-SKO

07-27-2012

LOUIS J. AMENDOLA, an individual, FRESNO BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC., d.b.a. VALLEY WIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY, a California Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. HOWARD REISSNER, an individual, AMY REISSNER, an individual, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. HOWARD REISSNER and AMY REISSNER, Counter-Claimants, v. LOUIS J. AMENDOLA and FRESNO BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC., a California Corporation, dbaVALLEY WIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY, Counter-Defendants.

MATTHEW R. DILDINE Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter- Defendants, LOUIS J. AMENDOLA and FRESNO BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC. RICHARD H. FRENCH, JR. THE FRENCH FIRM CO., P.A. COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP DARRYL J. HOROWITT Attorneys for Defendants and Counter- Claimants, HOWARD REISSNER and AMY REISSNER


RICHARD H. FRENCH, JR. (#87317)

THE FRENCH FIRM CO., L.P.A.

DARRYL J. HOROWITT (#100898)

REMA M. KOLIGIAN (#263918)

COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP

Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Claimants,

HOWARD REISSNER and AMY REISSNER

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF

COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

AND ORDER THEREON


Complaint Filed: June 16, 2011

Trial Date: November 19, 2013

It is hereby stipulated, by and between plaintiffs and counter-defendants, LOUIS J. AMENDOLA and FRESNO BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC., dba VALLEY WIDE BEVERAGE COMPANY, and defendants and counter-claimants, HOWARD REISSNER and AMY REISSNER, by and through their respective attorneys of record, that based on the settlement the parties have entered into, the complaint and counter-claim in the above-captioned matter may be dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1).

DOWLING AARON INCORPORATED

By: ______________

MATTHEW R. DILDINE

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter

Defendants, LOUIS J. AMENDOLA and

FRESNO BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC.

RICHARD H. FRENCH, JR.

THE FRENCH FIRM CO., P.A.

COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP

By: ______________

DARRYL J. HOROWITT

Attorneys for Defendants and Counter

Claimants, HOWARD REISSNER and

AMY REISSNER

ORDER

The parties have stipulated to dismiss the action, with prejudice. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1), the action is DISMISSED, with prejudice. All dates are VACATED. The clerk is hereby directed to close the action. IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Amendola v. Reissner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
Jul 27, 2012
NO. 1:11-CV-01001-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Amendola v. Reissner

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS J. AMENDOLA, an individual, FRESNO BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC., d.b.a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Jul 27, 2012

Citations

NO. 1:11-CV-01001-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)