From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amendment of Rule 2.510, 2007-21

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 28, 2008
ADM File No. 2007-21 (Mich. May. 28, 2008)

Opinion

ADM File No. 2007-21.

May 28, 2008.


On order of the Court, notice of the proposed changes and an opportunity for comment in writing and at a public hearing having been provided, and consideration having been given to the comments received, the following amendment of Rule 2.510 of the Michigan Court Rules is adopted, effective September 1, 2008.

[Additions to the text are indicated in underlining.]

Rule 2.510 Juror Personal History Questionnaire

(A)-(D) [Unchanged.]

(E) Special Provision Pursuant to MCL 600.1324. If a city located in more than one county is entirely within a single district of the district court, jurors shall be selected for court attendance at that district from a list that includes the names and addresses of jurors from the entire city, regardless of the county where the juror resides or the county where the cause of action arose.
Staff Comment: The amendment of MCR 2.510(E) was added by the Court pursuant to MCL 600.1324. Subrule (E) requires that, in a district court district comprised of a city located in two or more counties, jurors must be selected for court attendance at that district from a list that includes the names and addresses of jurors from the entire city. The rule is applicable to both civil and criminal cases pursuant to MCR 6.412(A).

The staff comment is not an authoritative construction by the Court.


Summaries of

Amendment of Rule 2.510, 2007-21

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 28, 2008
ADM File No. 2007-21 (Mich. May. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Amendment of Rule 2.510, 2007-21

Case Details

Full title:Amendment of Rule 2.510 of the Michigan Court Rules

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: May 28, 2008

Citations

ADM File No. 2007-21 (Mich. May. 28, 2008)