From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ameen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 14, 2006
932 So. 2d 498 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 4D04-4791.

June 14, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Joel T. Lazarus, Judge; L.T. Case No. 02-5010 CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Margaret Good-Earnest, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and August A. Bonavita, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Broward County has adopted an electronic court reporting system which, in this case, required the court to push a button in order to record arguments made at the bench outside the presence of the jury. It was found by the court that, after appellant was tried and convicted, none of the many legal arguments involving objections made at the bench were recorded either because of human error or mechanical error. The state has accordingly conceded that the record in this case is inadequate for appellate review and thus requires a new trial.

This resolution makes two of the issues raised by appellant moot, but as to the remaining issue, we agree with appellant that the officer, who was injured by the appellant when she was attempting to arrest him, should not have been permitted to testify that she took martial arts training after this incident.

Reversed.

GUNTHER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ameen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 14, 2006
932 So. 2d 498 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Ameen v. State

Case Details

Full title:Aesop AMEEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 14, 2006

Citations

932 So. 2d 498 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)