Opinion
1261N
June 4, 2002.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about February 5, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from, denied in part plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
NED H. BASSEN, RICHARD B. HERMAN for Plaintiff-appellant.
SANDEEP CHATRATH, BENNETT DAVID KRASNER, for Defendants-respondents.
Williams, P.J., Saxe, Buckley, Sullivan, Ellerin, JJ.
Inasmuch as plaintiff failed to adduce sufficient evidence demonstrating that it was likely to prevail on the merits on its causes for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, trade disparagement, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition, breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract, its motion for broad preliminary injunctive relief was properly denied (see, W. T. Grant Co. v. Srogi, 52 N.Y.2d 496, 517). Since plaintiff in its moving papers failed to demonstrate the elements necessary to issuance of a preliminary injunction, no hearing on the motion was required (see, Kvaerner U.S., Inc. v. Merita Bank PLC, 288 A.D.2d 6; CPLR 6312[c]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.