From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ambursen Engineering Corp. v. Fomento Industrial y Mercantil, S. A.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1950
93 N.E.2d 923 (N.Y. 1950)

Opinion

Argued May 24, 1950

Decided July 11, 1950

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, CORCORAN, J.

H. Broadman Epstein, Francis X. Conway and Joseph Markle for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.

Monroe H. Collenburg, Jerome S. Hess, Walter M. Hinkle and Frank Rashap for defendants, respondents and appellants.



A review of the record persuades us that the weight of evidence supports the trial court's finding that the value of plaintiff's services vis-a-vis the hydroelectric project — the subject of the fifth cause of action — was the sum of $50,000 rather than the amount of $35,000 found by the Appellate Division. Accordingly, the judgment of the Appellate Division is modified to the extent of reinstating the trial court's award of $50,000 in the fifth cause of action, thereby increasing the amount of the judgment against both defendants by the sum of $15,000, with interest, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be modified in accordance with the opinion herein, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Ambursen Engineering Corp. v. Fomento Industrial y Mercantil, S. A.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1950
93 N.E.2d 923 (N.Y. 1950)
Case details for

Ambursen Engineering Corp. v. Fomento Industrial y Mercantil, S. A.

Case Details

Full title:AMBURSEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Appellant and Respondent, v. FOMENTO…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 11, 1950

Citations

93 N.E.2d 923 (N.Y. 1950)
93 N.E.2d 923