Ambrusio v. Board of Trustees, Public Employees' Retirement System

1 Citing case

  1. Edens v. Superior Marble Glass

    346 Ark. 487 (Ark. 2001)   Cited 61 times
    Holding that the Commission may not arbitrarily disregard the testimony of any witness, nor may the Commission arbitrarily disregard other evidence submitted in support of a claim

    " For example, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, faced this issue in relation to disability benefits under the Public Employees' Retirement System and concluded that "identifiable" does not mean "identified." The requirement that "a traumatic event in order to qualify must be `identifiable as to the time and place in which it occurred' . . . is meant only to distinguish a single, discrete event from an ongoing process . . . . Ambrusio v. Board of Trustees, 489 A.2d 1223, 1224 (N.J.Super. 1985).II. Objective Findings.