From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ambrose v. Coffey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2012
NO. CIV. S-08-1664 LKK/GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-08-1664 LKK/GGH

01-17-2012

JOSEPH AMBROSE, D.C., Plaintiff, v. GARY COFFEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Having considered the stipulation of defendants and plaintiffs Joseph Ambrose, Michael Yates, Richard Sausedo, Pedram Vaezi, and Wilmer Origel, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS:

[1] The final pretrial conference in this case is hereby CONTINUED to March 5, 2012, at 3:00 P.M. in Department 4 of the above-entitled court.
[2] The trial date currently set will be VACATED, to be reset at the final pretrial conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Ambrose v. Coffey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2012
NO. CIV. S-08-1664 LKK/GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Ambrose v. Coffey

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH AMBROSE, D.C., Plaintiff, v. GARY COFFEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Citations

NO. CIV. S-08-1664 LKK/GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)