From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amboy Sequine Associates v. Gar Sing Restaurant, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 16, 1998
248 A.D.2d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 16, 1998


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff's first cause of action is not barred by the six-month Statute of Limitations applicable to this bulk transfer dispute ( see, UCC 6-111). The complete failure of the defendant transferee Gar Sing Restaurant, Inc., d/b/a Island Taste Restaurant to comply with the notice provisions of article 6 of the Uniform Commercial Code ( see, UCC 6-104 [1]; 6-105) was tantamount to a "concealment" of a transfer of assets within the meaning of UCC 6-111 ( see, E. J. Trum, Inc. v. Blanchard Parfums, 33 A.D.2d 689; Cleaners Prods. Supply v. Garcia, 169 Misc.2d 418).

Since the plaintiff commenced the instant action within six months of its discovery of the concealed transfer, the plaintiff's action was timely commenced against the defendant transferee.

Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Amboy Sequine Associates v. Gar Sing Restaurant, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 16, 1998
248 A.D.2d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Amboy Sequine Associates v. Gar Sing Restaurant, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AMBOY SEQUINE ASSOCIATES, Respondent, v. GAR SING RESTAURANT, INC., Doing…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 16, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 885

Citing Cases

Korg USA, Inc. v. In Tune Industries, Inc.

Uniform Commercial Code § 6-111 U.C.C. provides that an action pursuant to UCC article 6 shall be commenced…