From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ambos v. Chastain

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 11, 1947
43 S.E.2d 592 (Ga. Ct. App. 1947)

Opinion

31621.

DECIDED JULY 11, 1947.

Certiorari; from Chatham Superior Court — Judge David S Atkinson. April 7, 1947.

Robert E. Falligant, for plaintiffs.

Walter W. Hinely, for defendants.


Where three distinct persons having no privity of interest among them, except that each owned separately certain fishing boats which had been assessed for taxation by the town, filed an appeal to the Board of Tax Assessors of the Town of Thunderbolt, seeking to have the tax assessments reduced, and where said appeal was denied and the three parties joined in a petition for certiorari to the superior court, and the superior court dismissed the petition, and where the parties filed a single bill of exceptions to this court complaining of the order dismissing the petition, and where no order of consolidation was taken by the board or otherwise, this court, under the rule stated in Patterson v. Hendrix, 72 Ga. 204, has no jurisdiction; and on motion duly made the case must be dismissed. See also Pupke, Reid Phelps v. Meador, 72 Ga. 230 (1); Western Assurance Co. v. Way, 98 Ga. 746 ( 27 S.E. 167); Erwin v. Ennis, 104 Ga. 861 ( 31 S.E. 444); Hicks v. Walker, 105 Ga. 480 ( 30 S.E. 383); Haralson County v. Pittman, 105 Ga. 513 ( 31 S.E. 183); Wells v. Coker Banking Co., 113 Ga. 857 ( 39 S.E. 298); Purvis v. Ferst's Sons Co., 114 Ga. 689 ( 40 S.E. 723); Askew v. Powell, 30 Ga. App. 244 ( 117 S.E. 769).

Writ of error dismissed. Sutton, C. J., and Felton, J., concur.

DECIDED JULY 11, 1947.


Summaries of

Ambos v. Chastain

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 11, 1947
43 S.E.2d 592 (Ga. Ct. App. 1947)
Case details for

Ambos v. Chastain

Case Details

Full title:AMBOS et al. v. CHASTAIN et al., Tax Assessors

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 11, 1947

Citations

43 S.E.2d 592 (Ga. Ct. App. 1947)
43 S.E.2d 592

Citing Cases

Bearden v. Lane

White v. Aiken, 197 Ga. 29 ( 28 S.E.2d 263). Where there is a contingent fee arrangement between a client and…

Johnson v. State

The State makes a motion to dismiss each bill of exceptions on the ground that this court is without…