From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ambory v. Ambory

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 21, 1983
442 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Summary

approving a voluntary dismissal when the motion was made after the trial court orally granted the defendant's motion to dismiss with prejudice but before the court entered a written order

Summary of this case from Patterson v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Opinion

No. 83-640.

December 21, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Collier County, Hugh D. Hayes, J.

Daniel D. Peck of Peck Peck, Naples, for appellants.

Michael J. Volpe of Monaco, Cardillo, Keith Volpe, Naples, for appellee.


Appellants appeal a final order entered by the trial court dismissing with prejudice their amended complaint. We reverse.

After a hearing held on February 14, 1983, on appellee's motion to dismiss, the trial judge orally announced that he was granting the motion. The next day the attorney for appellee received a letter from appellants advising that they had filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. On March 1, 1983, the trial court entered its formal order dismissing the cause with prejudice.

Appellants contend, and correctly, that it was error for the trial court to take any further action after the notice of voluntary dismissal was filed. A strict interpretation of Rule 1.420(a)(i), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, supports their contention as does the applicable case law. See Gonzalez v. Mulreany, 375 So.2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (wherein our sister court relied on the Florida Supreme Court's interpretation of Rule 1.420 in Fears v. Lunsford, 314 So.2d 578 (Fla. 1975)). In Fears the court held:

The rule is specific on this point. It states in unusual language, "the action may be dismissed by plaintiff without order of court" by (1) service before trial or (2) stating on the record a notice of dismissal. No action is required by the court under the rule. Hence, a statement by the court that the notice is approved, or a motion to dismiss, if made, is granted, adds nothing to the finality of the dismissal. The only remaining action required by the court contemplated by the rule would be to advise the jury thereof in a jury case.
Id. at 579.

Accordingly, the order appealed is REVERSED.

OTT, C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.


Summaries of

Ambory v. Ambory

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 21, 1983
442 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

approving a voluntary dismissal when the motion was made after the trial court orally granted the defendant's motion to dismiss with prejudice but before the court entered a written order

Summary of this case from Patterson v. Allstate Ins. Co.
Case details for

Ambory v. Ambory

Case Details

Full title:RITA E. AMBORY, JACQUELINE A. AMBORY, AND DONALD E. AMBORY, WHO SUES BY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 21, 1983

Citations

442 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Ware v. Williams

Appellant is correct that after service of the notice, the trial court had no further authority to enter the…

SERVICE EXPERTS v. NORTHSIDE A/C

However, this case involves the circumstance of a plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal of an action…