From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amazon.com v. Doe

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Sep 30, 2024
2:24-cv-01083-TL (W.D. Wash. Sep. 30, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-01083-TL

09-30-2024

AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Does 1-20, unknown parties doing business as “CHIN CHOPA,” and the following individuals Justin Cook, Timothy Rodgers, Sai Parvathareddy, Danielle Lantz, Brandon Wong, Bharath Kumar Gandhe, Berkcan Turkmenoglu, and Mike Ahlert, Defendants.

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs Bonnie MacNaughton, Tim Cunningham, Melina Garcia Sai Parvathareddy Pro Se, Sai Parvathareddy


Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Bonnie MacNaughton,

Tim Cunningham,

Melina Garcia

Sai Parvathareddy

Pro Se, Sai Parvathareddy

STIPULATED PERMANENT

INJUNCTION AS TO

DEFENDANT SAI

PARVATHAREDDY AND

PROPOSED ORDER

Tana Lin, United States District Judge

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC, and Amazon Technologies, Inc. (together, “Amazon”), and Defendant Sai Parvathareddy and (collectively “Settling Parties”), by and through Amazon and Parvathareddy's respective counsel of record, notify the Court that the Settling Parties have reached a settlement of all claims between them in this matter. Pursuant to the terms of that settlement, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree to entry of the permanent injunction below.

PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Pursuant to the above stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Sai Parvathareddy, and his respective employees, agents, successors and assigns, and all others in active concert or participation with him, are permanently enjoined and restrained from:

1. Accessing and using, whether directly or indirectly via a third party, intermediary, or proxy, Amazon.com, or any other Amazon online store around the world;
2. Exploiting or abusing Amazon's ordering or return services;
3. Making false statements or misrepresentations to Amazon;
4. Engaging in any activity that defrauds Amazon into paying money or providing replacement products for illegitimate returns;
5. Engaging in any scheme or malicious activity that interacts with Amazon; and
6. Knowingly and materially assisting or engaging any other person or business entity in engaging in or performing any of the activities listed above.

The Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over this matter for the limited purposes of enforcing the terms of the Settling Parties' settlement agreement and this Stipulated Permanent Injunction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Amazon.com v. Doe

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Sep 30, 2024
2:24-cv-01083-TL (W.D. Wash. Sep. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Amazon.com v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, a…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Sep 30, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-01083-TL (W.D. Wash. Sep. 30, 2024)