Amazon v. State

Full title: IRA M. AMAZON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 20, 2004

870 So. 2d 183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 2D03-4440.

Opinion filed February 20, 2004. Rehearing Denied March 24, 2004.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, Dee Anna Farnell, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Amazon v. State, 487 So.2d 8 (Fla. 1986); State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla. 1985); Wright v. State, 29 Fla. L. Weekly D84 (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 31, 2003) (en banc); Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Mobley v. State, 590 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). As this court did in Wright, we certify direct conflict with: Kirtsey v. State, 855 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Hernandez v. State, 825 So.2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Bingham v. State, 813 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002);Thames v. State, 769 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); and Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.