From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amaya v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 17, 1994
641 So. 2d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-3339.

August 17, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County, Robert S. Zack, J.

Sidney Z. Fleischman of Fleischman Fleischman, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ettie Feistmann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We reverse and remand for a new trial because of the trial court's error in refusing appellant access to counsel during an overnight recess at trial. We reject appellant's claims that the trial court erred in denying motions to dismiss and for directed verdict.

The state concedes, and we agree, that the trial court erred in refusing appellant access to counsel. See Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80, 96 S.Ct. 1330, 47 L.Ed.2d 592 (1976); Bova v. State, 410 So.2d 1343 (Fla. 1982). Further, we are unable to determine that the error was harmless under the strict test set out in State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986).

ANSTEAD, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Amaya v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 17, 1994
641 So. 2d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Amaya v. State

Case Details

Full title:HECTOR AMAYA, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 17, 1994

Citations

641 So. 2d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)