From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amaya v. Morca Constr. Servs.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jul 18, 2024
2:23-cv-673-NPM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 18, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-673-NPM

07-18-2024

WILMER MAURICIO AMAYA, FIDEL CRUZ, ANTONIO MARTINEZ, JOSE R. BALLESTEROS, SELVIN FLORES, PEDRO F. REYES, JAMIE ROMERO, JORGE RAMIREZ DOMINGUEZ, and KEVIN JESUS RIVERA FLORES, Plaintiffs, v. MORCA CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

NICHOLAS P. MIZELL, United States Magistrate Judge

In this Fair Labor Standards Act case, the parties have filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal. (Doc. 38). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action voluntarily if a stipulation of dismissal is signed by all parties who have appeared. The dismissal is effective on filing and requires no further action by the Court. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272, 1278 (11th Cir. 2012).

The text of the FLSA does not provide, and no Eleventh Circuit decision has ever held, that FLSA claims are exempt from Rule 41. To the contrary, the Eleventh Circuit has reasoned that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure apply “in actions brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act no less than in any other case.” Vasconcelo v. Miami Auto Max, Inc., 981 F.3d 934, 942 (11th Cir. 2020); see also Casso-Lopez v. Beach Time Rental Suncoast, LLC, 335 F.R.D. 458, 461-462 (M.D. Fla. 2020) (holding parties may terminate an FLSA case by filing either a Rule 41 stipulation of dismissal with prejudice or a Rule 68(a) notice of acceptance of an offer of judgment “and the district court is immediately powerless to interfere”); Dicomo v. KJIMS Dev. Co., Inc., No. 2:16-cv-327-FtM-99CM, 2016 WL 6678420, *1 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 14, 2016) (“[T]he parties may dismiss [an FLSA] case in its entirety pursuant to the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice without further action from the Court as it is unconditional and self-executing.”).

Accordingly, this action is dismissed with prejudice as to Wilmer Mauricio Amaya, Fidel Cruz, Antonio Martinez, Jose R. Ballesteros, Kevin Jesus Rivera Flores, Jamie Romero, Pedro F. Reyes, and Jorge Ramirez Dominguez and without prejudice as to Selvin Flores. Each party shall bear their own fees and costs, unless otherwise agreed. The clerk is directed to deny all pending motions, terminate all scheduled events, and close the case.


Summaries of

Amaya v. Morca Constr. Servs.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jul 18, 2024
2:23-cv-673-NPM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Amaya v. Morca Constr. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:WILMER MAURICIO AMAYA, FIDEL CRUZ, ANTONIO MARTINEZ, JOSE R. BALLESTEROS…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jul 18, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-673-NPM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 18, 2024)