From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amato v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jan 2, 2020
936 N.W.2d 466 (Mich. 2020)

Opinion

SC: 160248

01-02-2020

Mary Barretta AMATO, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.


Order

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

Cavanagh, J., did not participate due to her prior service as a member of the Attorney Grievance Commission.


Summaries of

Amato v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jan 2, 2020
936 N.W.2d 466 (Mich. 2020)
Case details for

Amato v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:MARY BARRETTA AMATO, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Jan 2, 2020

Citations

936 N.W.2d 466 (Mich. 2020)