From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amarise v. Cnty. of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 30, 2021
No. LA CV 20-06179-VBF-GJS (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2021)

Opinion

No. LA CV 20-06179-VBF-GJS

03-30-2021

KARMIYA AMARISE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.


ORDER

Overruling Objections (#63 and #64) and Adopting Report & Recommendation (#62) Granting Motions to Dismiss (#42 and #44); Dismissing the Action With Prejudice; Terminating the Case (JS-6)

Plaintiff's Objections [Doc #63 and Doc #64] are OVERRULED.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc #62] is ADOPTED.

Defendant County of Los Angeles's motion to dismiss [Doc #44] is GRANTED.

Defendant SMPD's motion to dismiss [Doc #46] is GRANTED.

All claims in the First Amended Complaint ("FAC") [Doc #30] against the County of Los Angeles and all claims against the SMPD are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

This case is TERMINATED (JS-6). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 30, 2021

/s/_________

Hon. Valerie Baker Fairbank

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Amarise v. Cnty. of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 30, 2021
No. LA CV 20-06179-VBF-GJS (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Amarise v. Cnty. of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:KARMIYA AMARISE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 30, 2021

Citations

No. LA CV 20-06179-VBF-GJS (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2021)