Opinion
April 26, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants' submissions established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with respect to the plaintiffs' claims of legal malpractice ( see, Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 325; Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851). Since the plaintiffs did not raise any triable issues of fact in their opposition papers, the trial court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' complaint alleging legal malpractice.
O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.