Summary
In Brown, 357 Md. at 367, 744 A.2d at 60, we held that petitioners' allegations that they had made a complaint to the landlords about the deteriorating condition of the paint and the respondents denying receiving the notice of the condition, was a genuine dispute of material fact and satisfied the "reason to know" test.
Summary of this case from Jones v. Mid-Atlantic Funding CompanyOpinion
No. 67, September Term, 1999.
January 13, 2000.
Adam Frank (Mir Law Associates, on brief), Rockville, for Petitioner.
No argument on behalf of Respondent.
Aruged before BELL, C.J., ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, KARWACKI, ROBERT L. (retired, specially assigned), JJ.
ORDER
The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case having been granted and heard, it is this 13th day of January, 2000
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.