From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amador v. City of San Jose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT
Nov 7, 2011
Case Number: CV11-02374 HRL (N.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Case Number: CV11-02374 HRL

11-07-2011

HENRY STEVEN AMADOR, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, CHIEF OF POLICE CHRIS MOORE, SERGEANT DAVID MOODY and DOES 1 THROUGH 50, inclusive, Defendants.

RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney (#88625) NORA FRIMANN, Assistant City Attorney (#93249) SHANNON SMYTH-MENDOZA, Sr. Deputy City Attorney (#188509) RICHARD NORTH, Deputy City Attorney (#225617) Attorneys for Defendant City of San Jose, Chief Chris Moore and Sgt. David Moody JOHN G. DOWNING, ESQ. Le, Downing & Associates, LLP Attorney for Plaintiff, HENRY AMADOR


RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney (#88625)

NORA FRIMANN, Assistant City Attorney (#93249)

SHANNON SMYTH-MENDOZA, Sr. Deputy City Attorney (#188509)

RICHARD NORTH, Deputy City Attorney (#225617)

Attorneys for Defendant City of San Jose, Chief Chris Moore and Sgt. David Moody

STIPLUATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING DEADLINE TO HOLD EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION

[Re: Docket No. 16]

Plaintiff and Defendants in the above entitled matter hereby stipulate, and jointly request that the Court extend the deadline to hold an Early Neutral Evaluation to January 13, 2012. In support of this stipulation, the parties hereby submit the following as good cause for granting this request:

1. The depositions of all the parties, including that of Plaintiff Henry Amador, Defendant Chief Chris Moore and Defendant Sgt. David Moody have yet to be completed. The depositions of the parties have been set to commence in November 2011.

2. The parties are in the process of negotiating a Stipulated Protective Order to facilitate the production of a videotape of the incident. Should the parties not be able to stipulate, the parties may need to have the videotape issue resolved by the Court so that the videotape can be utilized during the course of the ENE session.

3. James V. Fitzgerald, III, the Neutral in the above matter, has been informed of this information and has no objection to extending the deadline to hold the Early Neutral Evaluation as stipulated herein.

4. Due to various conflicts, including scheduled trials, the parties are unable to hold the Early Neutral Evaluation until January 13, 2012, which has been scheduled with he Neutral.

5. Given the fact that the postponement of the Early Neutral Evaluation would not delay the deadlines in this matter set by the Court (the trial has been set for November 5, 2012) and for the reasons set forth herein, the parties submit that good cause exists for he extension of the ADR deadline.

Accordingly, the parties hereby jointly request that the Court extend the deadline to complete the Early Neutral Evaluation to January 13, 2012.

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN G. DOWNING, ESQ.

Le, Downing & Associates, LLP

Attorney for Plaintiff, HENRY AMADOR

RICHARD DOYLE, City Attorney

SHANNON SMYTH-MENDOZA

Sr. Deputy City Attorney

Attorney for Defendants, CITY OF SAN

JOSE , CHIEF CHRIS MOORE and SGT.

DAVID MOODY

ORDER

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby extends the deadline to hold an Early Neutral Evaluation in this case to January 13, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

HONORABLE HOWARA K. LLOYD

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Amador v. City of San Jose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT
Nov 7, 2011
Case Number: CV11-02374 HRL (N.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Amador v. City of San Jose

Case Details

Full title:HENRY STEVEN AMADOR, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, CHIEF OF POLICE CHRIS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT

Date published: Nov 7, 2011

Citations

Case Number: CV11-02374 HRL (N.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2011)