Opinion
C.A. No. S17A-02-003
10-16-2017
Re: Am Vets Post No. 2 v. The Delaware Board of Charitable Gaming
T. HENLEY GRAVES RESIDENT JUDGE Richard E. Berl, Jr., Esquire
Berl & Feinberg, LLP
Dartmouth Business Center - Suite 3
34382 Carpenter's Way
Lewes, Delaware 19958 Carla A.K. Jarosz, Esquire
Department of Justice
820 N. French Street, Sixth Floor
Wilmington, Delaware 19801 On Appellant's Motion to Reargue: DENIED Dear Counsel:
Appellant has filed a timely Motion to Reargue the Court's decision entered on September 29, 2017. Appellee responded thereto.
The purpose of reargument is very limited. "[M]otions for reargument should not be used merely to rehash the arguments already decided by the court, or to present new arguments not previously raised."
The Court has reviewed its decision and is satisfied that it addresses the issues raised in Appellant's appeal from the Delaware Board of Charitable Gaming.
Appellant's Motion to Reargue is DENIED.
Very truly yours,
/s/ T. Henley Graves
T. Henley Graves oc: Prothonotary
Blevins v. Metzgar, 2017 WL 2709748 (Del. Super. June 22, 2017) (citations omitted).