From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.M. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 15, 2022
21-CV-6665 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 15, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-6665 (RA)

06-15-2022

A.M., individually and on behalf of M.M., a child with a disability, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

A.M. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 15, 2022
21-CV-6665 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 15, 2022)
Case details for

A.M. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

Case Details

Full title:A.M., individually and on behalf of M.M., a child with a disability…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 15, 2022

Citations

21-CV-6665 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 15, 2022)