From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Am. Tree Serv. v. Bundshuh

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct 16, 2017
232 So. 3d 484 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D17–1197

10-16-2017

AMERICAN TREE SERVICE, Clarendon National Insurance Company/Enstar, Petitioners, v. Eric BUNDSHUH, Respondent.

Robert B. Griffis of Jones, Hurley & Hand, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioners. Michael J. Winer of Law Office of Michael J. Winer, P.A., Tampa, for Respondent.


Robert B. Griffis of Jones, Hurley & Hand, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioners.

Michael J. Winer of Law Office of Michael J. Winer, P.A., Tampa, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In this proceeding of original jurisdiction, Petitioners are the Employer/Carrier in a workers' compensation case, and Respondent is the injured worker. Petitioners seek to prohibit any further action stemming from a show cause order entered against them by a Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC).

The petition is hereby dismissed as moot because no justiciable controversy remains. Even though Petitioners have responded to the JCC's show cause order, the JCC who entered that show cause order has been recused, and the successor JCC has entered an order that he will not, at this time, act on or enforce the previous JCC's order to show cause. Prohibition is not appropriate at this time, as there is no impending injury that cannot be reviewed by other means.

DISMISSED.

LEWIS, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Am. Tree Serv. v. Bundshuh

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct 16, 2017
232 So. 3d 484 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Am. Tree Serv. v. Bundshuh

Case Details

Full title:AMERICAN TREE SERVICE, Clarendon National Insurance Company/Enstar…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Oct 16, 2017

Citations

232 So. 3d 484 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)