From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Am. Natl. Bk. v. Mercantile Natl. BK

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 19, 1960
122 So. 2d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)

Opinion

Nos. 59-754, 59-755, 59-756.

June 23, 1960. Rehearing Denied August 19, 1960.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; John W. Prunty, Judge.

Blackwell, Walker Gray and Edward L. Magill, Miami, for appellants.

Broad Cassel, Miami Beach, and L.J. Cushman, Miami, for appellee.


Affirmed. See First Nat. Bank of Portland v. United States Nat. Bank, 100 Or. 264, 197 P. 547, 14 A.L.R. 479, and Atlantic Nat. Bank of Jacksonville v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 250 F.2d 114.

HORTON, C.J., and ODOM, ARCHIE M., Associate Judge, concur.

CARROLL, CHAS., J., dissents.


I respectfully dissent because I am of the opinion that there was a triable issue on a material matter on which the right to recover under the second count depended, and that was whether there was negligence or fault on the part of the collecting bank which caused or contributed to the payment of the checks by the Chicago banks. See United States v. Chase National Bank, 252 U.S. 485, 494, 40 S.Ct. 361, 64 L.Ed. 675; Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. Dade Federal Savings Loan Ass'n, 5 Cir. 1959, 268 F.2d 951, 953.


Summaries of

Am. Natl. Bk. v. Mercantile Natl. BK

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 19, 1960
122 So. 2d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)
Case details for

Am. Natl. Bk. v. Mercantile Natl. BK

Case Details

Full title:AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF CHICAGO, APPELLANT, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 19, 1960

Citations

122 So. 2d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)