Am. Implement, Inc. v. Wilson

Full title: AMERICAN IMPLEMENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. COURTNEY WILSON, LAYNE ATWATER…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 30, 2012

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01962-LTB (D. Colo. Oct. 30, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01962-LTB

10-30-2012

AMERICAN IMPLEMENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. COURTNEY WILSON, LAYNE ATWATER, and LARRY HOLLAND, Defendants.

Lewis T. Babcock

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIMS

ASSERTED AGAINST DEFENDANT LAYNE ATWATER

THE COURT, having reviewed Plaintiff American Implement, Inc.'s ("American Implement") Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Claims Asserted Against Defendant Layne Atwater (the "Motion") (Doc 15) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), and being fully advised in the premises and good cause shown therefor, HEREBY

ORDERS that the Motion shall be and is hereby GRANTED. The claims American Implement asserts in its Complaint [Doc. No. 1] (the "Complaint") only inasmuch as they are asserted against Defendant Layne Atwater (the "Atwater Claims") shall be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, with American Implement and Defendant Layne Atwater to bear its/his own attorneys' fees and costs only with regard to the Atwater Claims; and

FURTHER ORDERS that this Order does not and shall not affect or otherwise alter the claims asserted in the Complaint against Defendants Courtney Wilson and Larry Holland.

BY THE COURT:

Lewis T. Babcock

United States District Court Judge