From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alvarez v. Yost

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 28, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-71J (W.D. Pa. Aug. 28, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-71J.

August 28, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for a Report and Recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on August 8, 2006, docket no. 4, recommending that the petition be summarily denied without service.

The petitioner was notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1), he had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner filed timely objections, docket no. 5, which I have reviewed de novo but reject.

After de novo review of the record of this matter, the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2006, it is

ORDERED that the petitioner's petition is denied. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Alvarez v. Yost

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 28, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-71J (W.D. Pa. Aug. 28, 2006)
Case details for

Alvarez v. Yost

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR DEJESUS ALVAREZ, Petitioner v. JOHN YOST, WARDEN, F.C.I. LORETTO…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 28, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-71J (W.D. Pa. Aug. 28, 2006)