From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alvarez v. Rest. 101

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 9, 2022
21 Civ. 6133 (PAE) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 9, 2022)

Opinion

21 Civ. 6133 (PAE) (SLC)

05-09-2022

JACQUELINE ALVAREZ and ANGELINA ALMONTE, Plaintiffs, v. RESTAURANT 101 INC. d/b/a DYCKMAN EXPRESS RESTAURANT ET AL, Defendants.


ORDER

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, DISTRICT JUDGE

On May 6, 2022, the parties reached agreement on all issues in court-order mediation. See Dkt. 43. However, because this case is a wage-and-hour case brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Court must review the settlement by the parties under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015).

The parties are therefore directed to submit their proposed settlement for review by May 31, 2022, along with a memorandum of law explaining why the settlement warrants approval under Cheeks.

The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to reopen this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Alvarez v. Rest. 101

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 9, 2022
21 Civ. 6133 (PAE) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Alvarez v. Rest. 101

Case Details

Full title:JACQUELINE ALVAREZ and ANGELINA ALMONTE, Plaintiffs, v. RESTAURANT 101…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 9, 2022

Citations

21 Civ. 6133 (PAE) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. May. 9, 2022)