From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alvarez v. Fuentes

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jul 19, 2010
07-CV-5261 (KAM) (VVP) (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2010)

Opinion

07-CV-5261 (KAM) (VVP).

July 19, 2010


ORDER


By Report and Recommendation dated June 29, 2010, Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky recommends that, based upon plaintiffs' counsel's June 22, 2010 letter (Doc. No. 43) stating that plaintiffs seek to withdraw all claims against defendant Dean Javier Fuentes, the pending motion for default judgment against Fuentes (Doc. No. 31) be deemed withdrawn and that this action be dismissed without prejudice as against Fuentes. (Doc. No. 44, Report and Recommendation ("R R").) The court has not received any written objections to the R R and finds no clear error on the face of the record. See Urena v. New York, 160 F. Supp. 2d 606, 609-10 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) ("To accept the report and recommendation of a magistrate, to which no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.") (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). The R R is thus adopted as the opinion of the court.

Because Fuentes is the sole remaining defendant, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to dismiss this action without prejudice as against Fuentes and to close this case. Plaintiff's counsel shall mail a copy of this order to Fuentes at his last known address and file a declaration of service within three business days.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Alvarez v. Fuentes

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jul 19, 2010
07-CV-5261 (KAM) (VVP) (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Alvarez v. Fuentes

Case Details

Full title:MERCEDES ALVAREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEAN JAVIER FUENTES, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Jul 19, 2010

Citations

07-CV-5261 (KAM) (VVP) (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2010)