From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alvarez v. Arnold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 13, 2018
Case No. CV 17-07599 PSG (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-07599 PSG (RAO)

03-13-2018

MARCELLO T. ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. ERIC ARNOLD, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS. CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The time for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied, and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: 3/13/18

/s/_________

PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Alvarez v. Arnold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 13, 2018
Case No. CV 17-07599 PSG (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2018)
Case details for

Alvarez v. Arnold

Case Details

Full title:MARCELLO T. ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. ERIC ARNOLD, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 13, 2018

Citations

Case No. CV 17-07599 PSG (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2018)