From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alvarez v. Aazam Food Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 10, 2021
15-CV-3570 (GBD) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2021)

Opinion

15-CV-3570 (GBD) (BCM)

12-10-2021

JESUS ALVAREZ, Plaintiff, v. AAZAM FOOD CORP. D/B/A 28 SCOTT'S CAFE &DELI, RAJIV KUMAR CHAND, and ASHIMA CHAND, Defendant.


ORDER

BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge.

The undersigned magistrate judge has received, via mail, an undated letter from Ashima Chand to Judge Daniels, which appears to seek expedited judicial action with respect to defendants' proposed order to show cause (denied by Judge Daniels on December 7, 2021). The letter bears no indication that it was copied to defendants' counsel, nor to plaintiff or his counsel.

Because the letter is an unauthorized pro se submission from a represented party, the Court will reject the letter for filing, and will instead forward it to defendants' counsel of record. See Mitchell v. Senkowski, 2006 WL 3063464, at *2 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 2006) ("the Court refuses to accept Plaintiff's pro se Motion to vacate because he continues to be represented by an attorney"); Davidson v. Scully, 1995 WL 104020, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 1995) (since plaintiff was represented by counsel, "the Court can find no error in the Magistrate Judge's disregard of Plaintiff's pro se submissions, and the Court has, itself, disregarded those submissions in resolving this motion").

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Alvarez v. Aazam Food Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 10, 2021
15-CV-3570 (GBD) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Alvarez v. Aazam Food Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JESUS ALVAREZ, Plaintiff, v. AAZAM FOOD CORP. D/B/A 28 SCOTT'S CAFE &DELI…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 10, 2021

Citations

15-CV-3570 (GBD) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2021)