From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alvarado v. W. Range Ass'n

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 10, 2022
3:22-cv-00249-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Nov. 10, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00249-MMD-CLB

11-10-2022

CIRILO UCHARIMA ALVARADO, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WESTERN RANGE ASSOCIATION, Defendant.

ELLEN JEAN WINOGRAD, ESQ., and JOSE TAFOYA, ESQ., of WOODBURN AND WEDGE, Attorneys for Defendant WESTERN RANGE ASSOCIATION FAIRMARK PARTNERS, LLP., JAMIE CROOKS, ESQ., Attorneys for Plaintiff THIERMAN BUCK, LLP MARK R. THIERMAN, ESQ., JOSHUA D. BUCK, ESQ. LEAH L HONES, ESQ JOSHUA HENDRICKSON, ESQ Attorneys for Plaintiff TOWARDS JUSTICE DAVID H. SELIGMAN, ESQ., (Pro Hac Vice) NATASHA VITERI, ESQ., (Pro Hac Vice) ALEXANDER HOOD, ESQ., (Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff


ELLEN JEAN WINOGRAD, ESQ., and JOSE TAFOYA, ESQ., of WOODBURN AND WEDGE, Attorneys for Defendant WESTERN RANGE ASSOCIATION

FAIRMARK PARTNERS, LLP., JAMIE CROOKS, ESQ., Attorneys for Plaintiff

THIERMAN BUCK, LLP MARK R. THIERMAN, ESQ., JOSHUA D. BUCK, ESQ. LEAH L HONES, ESQ JOSHUA HENDRICKSON, ESQ Attorneys for Plaintiff

TOWARDS JUSTICE DAVID H. SELIGMAN, ESQ., (Pro Hac Vice) NATASHA VITERI, ESQ., (Pro Hac Vice) ALEXANDER HOOD, ESQ., (Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT WESTERN RANGE ASSOCIATION'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF IT'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO TRANSFER VENUE [WESTERN RANGE ASSOCIATION'S] FIRST REQUEST

Defendant WESTERN RANGE ASSOCIATION ("Western Range"), by and through its counsel, ELLEN JEAN WINOGRAD, ESQ., and JOSE TAFOYA, ESQ., of WOODBURN AND WEDGE, and Plaintiff CIRILO UCHARIMA ALVARADO ("Plaintiff), by and through his counsel of record, JAMIE CROOKS, ESQ., of FAIRMARK PARTNERS, LLC, hereby stipulate to extend the time in which Defendant Western Range has to Reply to its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or in the Alternative Motion to Transfer Venue.

Defendant Western Range filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or in the Alternative Motion to Transfer Venue on August 16, 2022. [Doc #23], The parties filed a stipulation to expand time for Plaintiff to file Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, to and including October 14, 2022, and to extend Defendant's time to file a Reply, to and including November 14, 2022. [Doc #26]. The Order granting the extensions was entered on August 28, 2022. [Doc #27],

This is the second request by the parties for an extension and it is Western Range Association's first request. The parties agree to allow Defendant Western Range to and including November 22, 2022 to file its reply in support of the Dismissal Motion.

This request for an extension is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.

The undersigned does hereby affirm pursuant to NRS 239B.030 that the preceding document does not contain the social security number of any person.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Alvarado v. W. Range Ass'n

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 10, 2022
3:22-cv-00249-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Nov. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Alvarado v. W. Range Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:CIRILO UCHARIMA ALVARADO, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 10, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00249-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Nov. 10, 2022)