Opinion
3:22-cv-00249-MMD-CLB
08-22-2023
CIRILO UCHARIMA ALVARADO, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; Plaintiff, v. WESTERN RANGE ASSOCIATION, el al., Defendants.
EDELSON PC YAMAN SALAHI (Pro Hac Vice) Counsel for Plaintiff and the Putative Class FABIAN VANCOT DAVID M. SEXTON, ESQ. Counsel for Defendant Ellison Ranching Company SIMONS HALL JOHNSTON PC DUNCAN G. BURKE, ESQ. Counsel for Defendants John Espil Sheep Co. Inc., The Little Paris Sheep Company, LLC, Borda Land & Sheep Company, LLC, and Holland Ranch, LLC JERRY SNYDER LAW JERRY M. SNYDER Counsel for Defendants F.I.M. Corporation, Need More Sheep Co LLC, and Faulkner
EDELSON PC YAMAN SALAHI (Pro Hac Vice) Counsel for Plaintiff and the Putative Class
FABIAN VANCOT DAVID M. SEXTON, ESQ. Counsel for Defendant Ellison Ranching Company
SIMONS HALL JOHNSTON PC DUNCAN G. BURKE, ESQ. Counsel for Defendants John Espil Sheep Co. Inc., The Little Paris Sheep Company, LLC, Borda Land & Sheep Company, LLC, and Holland Ranch, LLC
JERRY SNYDER LAW JERRY M. SNYDER Counsel for Defendants F.I.M. Corporation, Need More Sheep Co LLC, and Faulkner
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS
By and through then counsel, Plaintiff Ciiilo Ucharima Alvarado and Defendants F.I.M. Corporation (“F.I.M.”), Need More Sheep Company, LLC (“Need More Sheep”), Faulkner Land and Livestock Company, Inc. (“Faulkner”), Borda Land & Sheep Company, LLC (“Borda”), Holland Ranch, LLC (“Holland Ranch”), John Espil Sheep Co., Inc. (“Espil Sheep”), Little Paris Sheep Company, LLC (“Little Paris”), and Ellison Ranching Company (“Ellison”) (together, “Stipulating Defendants”), hereby stipulate as follows, subject to the Court's approval.
WHEREAS, each of the Stipulating Defendants has filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff s First Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b), see Dkt. Nos. 96 (F.I.M., Faulkner, and Need More Sheep), 99 (Ellison), and 109 (Borda, Holland Ranch, Espil Sheep, and Little Paris);
WHEREAS. Defendant Ellison has also filed a motion to strike certain allegations pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f), see Dkt. No. 100:
WHEREAS, on August 11, 2023, the Court approved a stipulation between Plaintiff and Defendants F.I.M., Faulkner, and Need More Sheep modifying the briefing schedule for the latter's motion to dismiss, such that Plaintiff s opposition would be due on September 12, 2023 and the moving Defendants' reply brief would be due on September 19, 2023, see Dkt. No. 105; and, WHEREAS, subsequently, counsel for Plaintiff and the other moving Defendants, namely, Ellison. Borda. Holland Ranch, and Espil Sheep, and Little Paris, met and conferred and agreed that synchronizing the briefing schedules on all pending motions would serve the interests of efficiency, and further agreed that Defendants' reply deadline shall be two weeks after Plaintiffs' opposition brief, or September 26, 2023.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
• Plaintiff s deadline to file briefs m opposition to the Stipulating Defendants' motions to dismiss and motion to strike shall be September 12, 2023; and, • Stipulating Defendants' reply briefs shall be due on September 26, 2023.
Dated: August 21, 2023
ORDER
Pursuant to the Parties' stipulation, the Court orders as follows:
• Plaintiff s deadline to file briefs in opposition to the Stipulating Defendants' motions to dismiss and motion to strike shall be September 12, 2023; and
• Stipulating Defendants' reply briefs shall be due on September 26, 2023.
IT IS SO ORDERED.