From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alvarado v. Janda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 18, 2016
Case No. 8:13-CV-02000-BRO (LAL) (C.D. Cal. May. 18, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 8:13-CV-02000-BRO (LAL)

05-18-2016

VICTOR ESTEBAN ALVARADO, Petitioner, v. G.J. JANDA, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Final Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.
///

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealabilitv. DATED: May 18, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 154 L. Ed. 2d 931 (2003).


Summaries of

Alvarado v. Janda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 18, 2016
Case No. 8:13-CV-02000-BRO (LAL) (C.D. Cal. May. 18, 2016)
Case details for

Alvarado v. Janda

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR ESTEBAN ALVARADO, Petitioner, v. G.J. JANDA, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 18, 2016

Citations

Case No. 8:13-CV-02000-BRO (LAL) (C.D. Cal. May. 18, 2016)